As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology are developing every day and it is an important part of our lives. Most works and duties are related to technology. Some people believe that we are dependent on technology and it reduces overall performance of thinking and decision making; others disagree. In my view, it is not good idea to say that dependency to technology is surely harmful; it is beneficial rather than detrimental for two important reason.
The main reason that dependency to technology for solving problem is useful, is that this can make our lives more comfortable and it can give us more time to think about more important issues. On the other word, some of our duties can be done by modern facilities and we can devote our valuable time to other problems and having more time decreases our stress, consequently, enhance our ability to think about vital issues. For instance, a few years ago, there were not washing machine and householders had to spend one or two hours for washing clothes but now they can think to other duties such as learning new things and teaching their children.
In addition, people make less errors when they use technology for solving their problems. For example, in past, when people wanted to write a letter, they had to write on paper and use old postal service for sending them. It took long time and cause stress because you were unable to track your envelope but nowadays people send many text messages in one minute, it is safer and faster. They just focus on what they want to write.
In sum, some people thinks that this dependency can be detrimental but it would be more useful in many cases. However, we should consider this point that in some special conditions we would better do our works without using technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...r children. In addition, people make less errors when they use technology for sol...
^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...or solving their problems. For example, in past, when people wanted to write a letter, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in many cases, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80463576159 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4705914678 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559602649007 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9537665148 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249975974243 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860760116836 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783762450175 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134377732852 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403496411964 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.