As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this evergrowing technological phase where everyday a new technology or gadgets can be seen in palms of people, humanity is going towards phase where every work of human will be replaced by machines, leaving humans either idle with lots of heath problems circling them or leaving them poor with not even one meal a day to afford.This will surely increase the already exsisting gap in society between rich and poor where rich will be more benefitted from this technology and poor will have no idea how to live on this earth. But the harm seen to humans will be physically. Taking about mental harm, i don't agree that humans will dimish their thinking ability. This can be proved by two reasons below.
Firstly, as these machines and gadgets will be development by humans, they will require critical as well as cognitive minds to come up with such technologies. Even if they make robots that can mimic human minds, it will be impossible for robots to think like humans. This is because humans know about the problems faced by them in their living and this encourages them to come up with such technologies. This can be interpretted by robots. So new devices coming up every hour can;t replace the minds that made them.
Secondly, as the technology is increasing, the demand of skilled minds are increasing giving human tough exposure in this changing environment. This can be seen in the area of education where everyday a new learning is added to circullum of scholars. The education is becoming harder and harder not giving chance to humans to think normally. Humans explore the already exsisting areas, fuse them and come up with new research that was not prevalent before. This makes possible human minds to think more cognitively and make such technologies that change lives of people. THerefore, human mind devlelop more complex stuctures in it to come up with new discoveries never known before.
Thirdly, if we say that we equip robots with human senses, robots can't take stand in front of experiences of humans that make them know about different areas to think about. These senses in robots will be limited. For example, the sophia robot who people know as human robot have all capabilities to replace work of people or answer every question in world. But she can't advise or makes the lives of people better when it comes to asking her about human challenges and experiences. Thus human mind remain unique in his ideas.
As conclusion, I would like to state that even if technology can harm human life with unemployment and poverty all over the world. It can't change how human thinks to change their lives and make them more easier and sophisticated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s evergrowing technological phase where everyday a new technology or gadgets can be seen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... with not even one meal a day to afford.This will surely increase the already exsist...
^^^^
Line 1, column 604, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...physically. Taking about mental harm, i dont agree that humans will dimish their thi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, they will require critical as well as cognitive minds to come up with such tec...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... be seen in the area of education where everyday a new learning is added to circullum of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... equip robots with human senses, robots cant take stand in front of experiences of h...
^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he sophia robot who people know as human robot have all capabilities to replace w...
^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...answer every question in world. But she cant advise or makes the lives of people bet...
^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...answer every question in world. But she cant advise or makes the lives of people bet...
^^^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...about human challenges and experiences. Thus human mind remain unique in his ideas. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ment and poverty all over the world. It cant change how human thinks to change their...
^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ment and poverty all over the world. It cant change how human thinks to change their...
^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...nks to change their lives and make them more easier and sophisticated.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2217.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85120350109 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51061648433 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481400437637 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.041654173 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.772727273 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176218479476 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593986989748 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381902842914 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114248413187 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240867389672 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.8971910112 248% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.