People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It is debatable whether people ought to exert risky actions only after they have pondered about the possible outcomes. Risky actions have an implication of negative consequences. They are considered risky because they have higher tendency to have failed results. In order to engender the most ideal situation, it is desirable for people to make dangerous decisions only after careful premeditation.
To begin with, risky actions could have detriments as time goes by. In other words, even though there is no presence of visible harm as of this moment, there could be bigger damage in the future especially if dangerous decisions were made without careful consideration. Take Enron Scandal as an example. Enron was a successful energy company, but with failed deals and projects, the company inevitably had to declare bankruptcy. However, the executives undertook risky action by refusing to declare bankruptcy to maintain their fame and wealth. The situation seemed alright for a while; nevertheless, their deception was revealed, and at that point, there was no possibility of recovery at all. Had executives of Enron company ruminated about how their refusal of bankruptcy would alter their situation, they might have had better chance to recover from the company's debt. This cogently shows that consideration of the future is essential since situations can change as time changes.
Moreover, different outcomes could be yielded depending on the person who is engaged in undertaking risky action. Who is involved in a dangerous situation is a very important matter since that can change everything. Just because one decision worked for a certain person, it does not mean that the same decision will work for everyone. To illustrate this, take Bill Gates as an instance for this case. Bill Gates, one of the most influential figure worldwide, who is a CEO of an IT company, dropped out of Harvard College since he sought no meaning in continuing his education. After the dropout, he led his company, Microsoft, into a huge success. Nevertheless, would it have worked for others is questionable. The risky action Bill Gates undertook brought huge success to him, but it will not necessarily so to many other people; in fact, it has higher tendency to engender detrimental results if people drop out of school. Therefore, the person who is undertaking the risky action is a crucial factor, which is why people should carefully consider the possible consequences instead of merely emulating one successful person because conditions are different for them.
Nonetheless, admittedly, under emergency, there is not enough time given to people for enough ponderation. Even in those situations, however, people should gather and discuss about the possible outcomes as much as possible to effectively diminish the damage. Any actions could be risky in under emergency, but even with little premeditation and analysis about the results, people could lead the detriments to minimum.
All in all, because of aforementioned reasons, people ought to premeditate before undertaking risky actions.
Comments
There are no issues when the
There are no issues when the essay topic is a full one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ntial figure worldwide, who is a CEO of an IT company, dropped out of Harvard College...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...figure worldwide, who is a CEO of an IT company, dropped out of Harvard College since h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause conditions are different for them. Nonetheless, admittedly, under emergency...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in fact', 'in other words', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229927007299 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.155109489051 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0967153284672 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0529197080292 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.036496350365 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133211678832 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0328467153285 0.0406280797675 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86678422998 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0310218978102 0.030933414821 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0839416058394 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.029197080292 0.0249443105267 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127737226277 0.0148568991511 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3096.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 487.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35728952772 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414784394251 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318275154004 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232032854209 0.200843997647 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151950718686 0.132149295362 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86678422998 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 219.290929204 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515400410678 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 60.8177204082 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.48 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0670147943 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.84 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.48 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.48 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 51.3075154004 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.61940298507 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301978317789 0.391690518653 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0899305205378 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0533308479958 0.077325440228 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.452519446947 0.547984918172 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173373568609 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101849662502 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550907169396 0.0892212321368 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.241776759166 0.385218514788 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0640543959831 0.0692045440612 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189632964621 0.275328986314 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653888596987 0.0653680567796 100% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.30420353982 283% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.