People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

A good decision is one that is in the decision maker's best interest, and one that the decision maker would not regret. Making emotional decisions often lead to poor decision making, and the attempt to justify poor decision making with logic would only aggravate the mistake.

Decision making is not a trivial task for our brain. The brain works assiduously to gather useful information from multiple brain areas to assist us in making the most informed decision possible. The process of decision making occurs in the highest-functioning brain area called prefrontal cortex, an area that develops throughout adolescence, responsible for complex planning, abstraction and logic; whereas emotion occurs in primitive brain areas such as amygdala or basal ganglia, which are common in a lot of lower mammals, such as mice. Trusting emotions to guide our decisions arguably reduces our capability to judge the situation to that of a lower mammal. It causes us to overlook important input and cues available to us, and only resort to our most primitive subconsciousness.

For exactly the biological basis explained above, basing decisions on emotions often diminish our most valued humanity in our decision making. There are endless incidences, in both public and private domains, where people resort to fear and anger and make detrimental decisions for their future. For example, the irrational fear of terrorism has caused the people in the UK to vote in a recent referendum to leave the European Union. The people who voted for leaving EU had wanted the restriction on Free movement so badly that they failed to consider the detrimental consequences to the British economy following leaving the EU. Out of bigoted hatred or irrational fear, they voted for Britain to become an insular country. Many regretted the decision after, as reported by the mainstream media, yet a referendum cannot be reverted. Decisions made under the influence of emotion are bound to be fickle, hence often regretful.

To try to justify an emotional decision with logic would only be fooling your brain to strengthen what your gut told you. It is not a process of critical reflection, make no mistake. Once an irreversible decision is made, the decision maker is now under the influence of a powerful psychological phenomenon called 'Cognitive dissonance'. Cognitive dissonance is defined by the discomfort caused by the difficulties in justifying the emotional decision and the difficulties in reversing said decision. This discomfort is so strong, that the person often is motivated to find a justification for the decision, no matter how unjustifiable it is. This result in wrong beliefs being strengthened, and critical thinking being disrupted further.

As stated above, making emotional decision is bad

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'makers the best'.
Suggestion: makers the best
...decision is one that is in the decision makers best interest, and one that the decision mak...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for example', 'such as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244353182752 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.172484599589 0.157235817809 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106776180698 0.0880659088768 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492813141684 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0369609856263 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100616016427 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0616016427105 0.0406280797675 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9461050003 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0431211498973 0.030933414821 139% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100616016427 0.0997080785238 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0082135523614 0.0249443105267 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0164271047228 0.0148568991511 111% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2788.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 443.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2934537246 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.419864559819 0.366273622748 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322799097065 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250564334086 0.200843997647 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155756207675 0.132149295362 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9461050003 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 219.290929204 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528216704289 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 61.1735251518 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0952380952 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.095087163 59.4972553346 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.761904762 141.124799967 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 53.3751478018 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.57142857143 1.64882698954 95% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175518223098 0.391690518653 45% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119710925049 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0730524390705 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.511357838323 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.188276153405 0.149214159877 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678093236921 0.161403998019 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592039620098 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334645349988 0.385218514788 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0872512976105 0.0692045440612 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116110569369 0.275328986314 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625914631646 0.0653680567796 96% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.