People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement by author is polemical itself. It states that deciding on the basis of emotions and later justifying them with logic is a characteristic of poor decision makers. However, I somewhere disagree with the aforementioned sentence.
For example, assume a profitable food corporation making decisions on their one of the important policy with solely logic. They decided to close their certain product stores, which are going on loss. Now, what will be the repercussions of this decision taken keeping in mind the logic behind it? It might be possible that the local people residing in that particular area, evaluate this decision via emotions. They saw this step as a curse for employment in that region. This emotional evaluation might discredit the company's public image, and because of this, it might lose its valuable customers. In this case, this particular decision will turn down the revenue and the company might be in lose.
Similarly, for example, P&G company in India is an efficient holder of both, the profits and the emotional attachments of customers. A company working purely for profits is common, but an industry working for profits as well as the emotional attention of people, is not only uncommon but also, improving in its hold over market. Based on this thinking, P&G private limited is actively seeking heart of many buyers of its products. This is because, for every product, The P&G company donates a percent of its cost to an organization, Shiksha. This NGO works so as to support students in education by building schools and providing them books. In this way, many people are buying its items to contribute in this cause.
However, some might say that, what if an emotionally taken decision taken costs the company adversely? What if logic can enhance the decision and hence can profligate the company's market value. In order to answer such questions, one should keep in mind what the statement actually states. Taking decision based on decisions might downgrade the profit or value, but justifying them afterwards with logic, might prevent it from this danger. Hence, double crossing is always good for a person as well as for a multinational company.
To conclude, taking decision with mind might result in profit, but taking decision with mind as well as heart is always considered salubrious. Also, as Liz Maw, CEO of Net Impact says, "Sustainability is not only necessary for people or the planet, but also important for the success of business", one should keep this sustainabilty in mind by taking decisions emotionally and rationally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 558, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n organization, Shiksha. This NGO works so as to support students in education by buildi...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'as for', 'as to', 'for example', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248472505092 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.132382892057 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0631364562118 0.0880659088768 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0631364562118 0.0497285424764 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0386965376782 0.0444667217837 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136456211813 0.12292977631 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0448065173116 0.0406280797675 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82635648571 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0122199592668 0.030933414821 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0020366598778 0.0016655270985 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.103869653768 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0285132382892 0.0249443105267 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010183299389 0.0148568991511 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2595.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 424.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12028301887 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384433962264 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294811320755 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207547169811 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129716981132 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82635648571 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516509433962 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 58.3705287769 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.4347826087 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3609102608 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.826086957 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4347826087 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.9159146842 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.8347826087 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324106442479 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112093323484 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0831771820653 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486157653379 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13956879639 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119386054871 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548917685264 0.0892212321368 62% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.298703262686 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0506531045522 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223512761332 0.275328986314 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466682142334 0.0653680567796 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.