Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Human mind is very curious. It is lured by very unexpected ways. One of these ways is scandals. Scandals get attention better than any other means, there is no deniability that they are powerful, but it doesn't mean they are useful. They encourages other menacing traits of the society.
Encouraging scandals would result into maligned society. It will take us away from the truth. For example if an honest politician taking some serious action against a corporation which is corrupt. Now, the corporation can use scandals as a weapon against that politician. By means of ill wits they can set him up in a scandal. Now the public opinion will be against the politician and due to the building pressure the politician has to leave his incumbency. This is not a hypothetical example it is totally feasible.
The media nowadays is very powerful and will become even threatening.They can use scandals to their benefit. for example a political party own a certain news channel, they can use scandals to demolish the public image of party's competitors. Scandals can change the lives of the people involved in it and people around them. Often scandals deteriorates the public image of a person and could drive him/her to take a rash decision like suicide.
It's true that scandals have proven to beneficial to debunk many scams, but we can't deny that it is a dangerous means of attention seeking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...iability that they are powerful, but it doesnt mean they are useful. They encourages o...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'encourage'
Suggestion: encourage
...ut it doesnt mean they are useful. They encourages other menacing traits of the society. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...werful and will become even threatening.They can use scandals to their benefit. for ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...They can use scandals to their benefit. for example a political party own a certain...
^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...beneficial to debunk many scams, but we cant deny that it is a dangerous means of at...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92796610169 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73778331566 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 39.0205340318 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4117647059 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8823529412 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.82352941176 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139924021027 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403070515957 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303315823699 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787794652802 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216458730096 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.