Some believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time and financial well-being. Others believe that society need no make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The statement categorized into two types. First, society should save plant and animal species even though there are time spent, financially effect, and effort. On the other hand, the other assertion is that society doesn’t need to make any extraordinary effort with great cost. These two assertions are on a debate with similar reasons, which can be a cost, efforts; the real problem in this statement takes essentially into account about expenses from human to preserve living species. From primitive era, we as human were developing from time to time; consider how human tries to pursue their well-being by establishing first agriculture, and first industrialization. It was tremendous effort on how much people were trying to pursue for their future. However, during this development, it is not solely influencing positive benefits on human activity but it affects negatively on the environmental issues. Even worse, recent article asserts that there is no more “one-hundred percent pure clean” space on earth. Since then, it is the time that human race should protect the environment including all living species, not just for their selfishness. We should consider what is more important rather than ourselves.
Biological deterioration on biodiversity of all living creature including human, animal, plants are going to be best-fit condition for this statement. As previously explained, human development affects negatively on the environment and this will cause the living species to possibility of extinct. Food-chain in biodiversity forms basically a triangle, which the bases are cows, rabbits, frogs, and top of the triangle, there is human. The reason why I’m explaining this is because as soon as animals in base range and intermediate range are going to be deteriorated by negative influence, the last target will be us, human. We should consider about protection on animal and plant is worthy and cherished work even though there is great expenses.
Consider which one is ahead of situation, is it money, effort, time? Or is it more on the protection of living species? If we consider about future life, and at least maintain; especially increasing biodiversity, society should make a determination on the conservation of the living species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 708, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...zation. It was tremendous effort on how much people were trying to pursue for their ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...The reason why I'm explaining this is because as soon as animals in base range and in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are great expenses'?
Suggestion: there are great expenses
...s worthy and cherished work even though there is great expenses. Consider which one is ahead of situ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the conservation of the living species.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, well, at least, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4338028169 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05055466321 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4774800417 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268392054896 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788877265568 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781189236025 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173912804322 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775032595359 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.