The prompt argues that some people believe that successful leaders in any field should be competitive whereas other people assert that leader must be willing and able to cooperate. In my opinion, the successful leader should be working in harmony. High contention among leader can lead to war or destruction, and there is a chance of overuse of manpower and resources to win their contender. The competition can lead to progress of country and cooperation, but it should be done within the ethical grounds.
Highly competitive leaders are extremely hostile to their adversities and unwilling to make compromise among them. As a result, there can be further deterioration of country. For instance, in Afganistan, even though, after the expulsion of Russia, animosity among the various country leader and war-lords create a war among various country leaders. The major victim of it was the country itself and innocent people. Had the leader been working in harmony after Russian expulsion, many Afghani people would not be in refugee in other adjacent countries. Thus, if leaders are extremely competitive, they will be relentless despite the beneficial offer provided to them and it can afflict whole country or cooperation.
Second, leader having sentiment towards competition may cause a violation of human rights and exploit of natural resources. Leader, under the stress of high contention, may decree people to work more than a normal working hour, and order to use an excessive amount of resources which can have adverse environmental deterioration. Such condition can be highly deleterious to both people and environment. Thus, the highly competitive leaders are willing to take any insidious step in order to win their competitors.
Some may argue that competition enhances the rapid development of any cooperation or country. It is true, but such competition should be healthy and ethical. We can see, in developing countries, bomb being blast at voting sites, and leader being killed if they have a chance to win. Any sensible leader respects their adversaries and takes genuine steps towards competition. On other hands, highly completion leaders are willing to take any vicious steps to ace their opponent.
In conclusion, because of the above-given reasons, leaders should be willing to work together by accommodating peace and harmony among their competitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...r to win their competitors. Some may argue that competition enhances the rapid dev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37700534759 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89810094797 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4360652089 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.55 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375774818096 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122853062188 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104416234707 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223392734974 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878398167564 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.