Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
When it comes to the issue the main feature for a leader, some people believe that he should be highly competitive. However, others have the opposite view and think that a leader should have ability to cooperate with others. As far as I am concerned the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
First and most important reason is that a leader cannot consider all of aspect of the issue, which he wants to decide about it, while they have many knowledge. In fact, cooperation allows the leader to have others idea, which help them to take a better decision. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. It is quite common that a programmer deign some part of hi application for get feedback from users. Indeed, he never can create application without any mistakes, and also refrain this mistake is costly and time consuming. Nevertheless, users’ feedback let him to improve their application easily.
A further point we must consider is that cooperation assists the leader to do many things in short time. It is quite normal that if we trust on others and lets them to do part of a project, we can accomplish it in the less time. In addition, cooperation gives the sense of being useful to employees, so they try to increase productivity and quality. In this ay, a great leader can not overlook of this effective factor, which is important in competition-rich environment.
In contrast, the sense of competition stimulates the leader to focus more on his mistakes and try to eliminate them. Moreover, he has more enthusiasm to embrace challenges and copes with diversity of situations. Overall, he make more efforts for being success, and for achieve this never be give up, which is essential for a leader. Of course, the leader should notice for being success in competition he cannot do any things, which can be immoral.
All above evidence supports this fact that cooperation decreases mistakes, increases the employees efficiency and employees’ satisfaction. Admittedly, competition can have some advantages such as make more attempts for being success, while I strongly believe that profits in cooperation are more than that of in competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... have ability to cooperate with others. As far as I am concerned the last point ca...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...nts to decide about it, while they have many knowledge. In fact, cooperation allows ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...nts to decide about it, while they have many knowledge. In fact, cooperation allows the leader...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ant in competition-rich environment. In contrast, the sense of competition stim...
^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...th diversity of situations. Overall, he make more efforts for being success, and for...
^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ation decreases mistakes, increases the employees efficiency and employees' satisfac...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'in short', 'of course', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237089201878 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.150234741784 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0727699530516 0.0880659088768 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446009389671 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0610328638498 0.0444667217837 137% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12441314554 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0117370892019 0.0406280797675 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.85811242909 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328638497653 0.030933414821 106% => OK
Particles: 0.00234741784038 0.0016655270985 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.093896713615 0.0997080785238 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0281690140845 0.0249443105267 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0140845070423 0.0148568991511 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2240.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 374.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98930481283 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347593582888 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264705882353 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189839572193 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133689839572 0.132149295362 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85811242909 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 57.2285857635 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7203515605 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 45.1705882353 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.45871559633 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268869758384 0.391690518653 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0934634245642 0.123202303941 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0798184393084 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498212866976 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108558433132 0.149214159877 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990228133458 0.161403998019 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582421064637 0.0892212321368 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.315639121808 0.385218514788 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0615305656583 0.0692045440612 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172001386342 0.275328986314 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287055764875 0.0653680567796 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.