There is a continuous pressure on politicians about choosing a side in decision process. Some claim that that political leaders are seen as public figure of the society, in a way their decisions indicate how their society acts. However, I agree with opposide side that political leaders should determine and stay committed to particular principles and attitude regardless of the public demand. Furhthermore, for the sake of whole country, government should take the general opinion but should use this opinion as a consulting when questioning a policy.
Firstly, we can see examples of the cases that government conducts a referendum to learn how people think and how people want them to act in case of constitutional change or participating in a agreement or union. Besides, one should take into account that this votes will also include the decisions of politically and strategically unqualified segment of the population and accordingly, they can come up with a result which can harm government’s economic future or stability in the society. For instance, in Brexit case, they leave the decision to society and they chose to separate from European Union. It is obvious this will create vital problems for economy. This illustrates that in some cases whole society cannot be able to analyze such a political decision which is closely linked to national economy, hence, government should be aware of this fact and should not jump into taking action before questioning in terms of economic principles.
Secondly, there are also cases that government do not conduct a referendum but at the end their decision can be manipulated by public opinion. For example, in 2003, Erdogan did not choose to fight against in North Iraq in order to prevent a war. However this leaded to some political and economical obstacles throughout years. USA has become more powerful political force in that area and additionally there was a huge opportunity of benefit of petrolum source. In sum, manipulation of society due to fear of war has caused more political pressures on government and missing a possible richness in petrolum. This imply that government should not lose their objectivity in decision-making processes and should consider that people mostly focus on short run consequences rather than long run as in our case, short run fear of war has affected people’ acting so that they could not realise further implications of this decision..
In conclusion, the examples and angles given point out that government should not purely rely on public opinion since in this way they can come up with disadvantages in economical and political area as we have seen. They should rely on political and economical facts when analyzing a process and should follow a general principle as a benchmark for consistency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nstitutional change or participating in a agreement or union. Besides, one should...
^
Line 6, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n North Iraq in order to prevent a war. However this leaded to some political and econo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 930, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...se further implications of this decision.. In conclusion, the examples and an...
^^
Line 8, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of this decision.. In conclusion, the examples and angles given point out ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'besides', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248484848485 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.143434343434 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0848484848485 0.0880659088768 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0484848484848 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0323232323232 0.0444667217837 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143434343434 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0363636363636 0.0406280797675 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9448968528 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0222222222222 0.030933414821 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00606060606061 0.0016655270985 364% => OK
Determiners: 0.0828282828283 0.0997080785238 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.040404040404 0.0249443105267 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0222222222222 0.0148568991511 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2814.0 2732.02544248 103% => OK
No of words: 454.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19823788546 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387665198238 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29295154185 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226872246696 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149779735683 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9448968528 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 60.9663575069 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 26.7058823529 23.380412469 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5550073098 59.4972553346 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.529411765 141.124799967 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 23.380412469 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.941176470588 0.674092028746 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 56.001036538 51.4728631049 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.90990990991 1.64882698954 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384357605003 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120234876137 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0727636206238 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501235192189 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166369799109 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154581149939 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600642421381 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.385087073554 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0524656081723 0.0692045440612 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273434197 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758429021041 0.0653680567796 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30420353982 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.