Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented
The issue putforward by the author is a common debate which often reverbirates in colleges and even in news room. It has always been hot topic of discussio that "wether we have become a technology slaves?", With a small amount of introspection and retrospection, we will realize that the issue of reducing human interaction is somewhat true and it is increasing day by day with new additions to the social networking technology. At the same time it is also true that, we cannot deny the fact that technolgy has also been a blessing in disguise,bringing the closer.
There was a time when the family get-together were will filled with discussion, games and healthy conversation , but today family meetup has become a ritual, where the people are physical present, with people glued to sofas acessing the social networking busy posting their feeling, photographs and selfies. Which obviously proofs that the advancement of technology has obviously impacted our human interaction. This doesn't imply that there are no healty discussion, there are, but everthing is taking place in the virtual world.
The other side of the issue is equally strong, there was a time where long distance were the barrier in the communication, which technology has reduced to a great extent. Long distances not only impacted the relationships but also business. It has no denying that without technology we could have never been what we are today, we are able to send a message with click, send documents to another counrty within a day, and even write an applying to university without being physicaly present.
The current research in the hyperloop technology, which is expected, to bring the cities even closer that will definately redefine the infrastucture of mordern cities. It is also expected to provide a boon not only to infrastructre but also to the business and obviously the economy.
In conclusion, It is obvious that technology has impacted the human interaction, but it cannot be denied that the world to day enjoy and live is becaiuse of technology
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bringing
...lgy has also been a blessing in disguise,bringing the closer. There was a time when th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guise,bringing the closer. There was a time when the family get-together were w...
^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: WERE_MD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where will'?
Suggestion: where will
...as a time when the family get-together were will filled with discussion, games and healt...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'fill' or 'be filled'?
Suggestion: fill; be filled
... when the family get-together were will filled with discussion, games and healthy conv...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...scussion, games and healthy conversation , but today family meetup has become a ri...
^^
Line 2, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...their feeling, photographs and selfies. Which obviously proofs that the advancement o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ly impacted our human interaction. This doesnt imply that there are no healty discussi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10979228487 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98755632664 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528189910979 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5367482987 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0833333333 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173816562122 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567785485915 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589716278365 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948359319653 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482126266711 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.