Author has rightly put the two arguments, that are simply defying each other. It is understandable than morality plays key role in human society and culture, as the moral ethics are one of the key things which binds the humanity. It won't be denial of the fact that foundation also plays role in nurturing of the society, but there are lot of loophole to the assumption to elicit the conclusion for making foundation as key source of thought.
Education system consist of varsity of things which comes under one umbrella, it depends on how the curriculum have been decided, how the faculty takes up the courses, how educated they are many more like it. Foundation of educational system lies in what values you want to inject and stimulate students with, best example to cite would the education system in Finland, they have tremendously advanced in education system. The key things that separate Finland education system with rest of the world is what is the end result, they look forward for what the children want as an education. So morality and logical reasoning plays considerable part in education system, but not the only things which we should decide the ethics on which education system is based on.
As raised a opinion by the author that teaching of moral values, would lead to the foundation of the society, but doesn't strongly supports why it should be done. It is just belief that binds us to say moral values plays key role in education system, with no obligation it proves that education is all about moral ethics. Somewhere it helps the person to achieve good human being but the artfully it has been compared with education system which probably would not be true in its own sense. while considering the other acting argument that logical reasoning would somewhere lead to good moral society also derived from belief and experience of the peoples.
Logical thinking is all about thinking, or purging the gap of unknowing things with concluding the fact with good base. Logical thinking would right way to move inhibit the moral society values in students.
So after lot of arguments and understanding with arguments pitched by the author, it would be most likely to thing that foundation of education is most likely should be based on logical reasoning and factual thoughts. But it would be always cherishing thought to add moral values in students so they become better human beings and good peoples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...nt to inject and stimulate students with, best example to cite would the education sys...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cation system is based on. As raised a opinion by the author that teaching of ...
^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d to the foundation of the society, but doesnt strongly supports why it should be done...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...bly would not be true in its own sense. while considering the other acting argument t...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 226, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would always be
... reasoning and factual thoughts. But it would be always cherishing thought to add moral values ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s cherishing thought to add moral values in students so they become better human ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9099756691 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49704035654 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476885644769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0499174263 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.533333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73333333333 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226321775487 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874666682209 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519140073348 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133988585884 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477219666823 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.