Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
It would be innane to base teacher's salaries on performances of the students for several reasons. Teachers have a family to takecare of and mouths to feed. Some teachers might be indulged into research or social work, expenses of which are covered by their salary. Stripping them off of the wages they deserve will be unjudicious. The recommendation might be advantageous under certain cirumstances but mostly it fails under general consideration.
To begin with, it is not possible for students from different regions to perform equally well. As a cosmopolitan consensus estimates that eastern countries have students acute in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) fields than western countries. Does this detail justify that western mentor's salaries should be decremented and transffered to their eastern counter parts? Definitely Not. Students have varied interests and skills, and therefore judging a teacher's performance on basis of students is morally wrong.
Additionally, a teacher might be mentoring in a region affected by sever circumstances like war, famine or economic crisis. Students in these areas might fail to emulate students from other regions. They might be low on resources and time to dedicate to their studys. Therefore, cutting teachers salaries for low scores of students would have deleterious repercussions. For instance, children in India and South Africa, although not encouraged, but thiese childrens have to earn wages along with their schooling so that they could pay for the fundamental necessities of life, their low scores are inevitable.
However, it is necessary to have some platform to assess a teachers proficiency, to ensure that the students are getting the best, as a role of a teacher is very crucial in shaping the future. It can be suggested that instead of salaries a mentor's appraisal, perquisites or work-hours might be commensurated to teacher's ability. Incompetent teachers should be required to take additional skill enhancing class for them selves,
Conclusively, directly affecting a teachers salary on basis of his student's performances is not the right step to take, but considering that teachers play a very important role, assessing their performance is quite important and therefore, other means of assessing them shall be implemented.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...sts and skills, and therefore judging a teachers performance on basis of students is mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ssary to have some platform to assess a teachers proficiency, to ensure that the student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mentors'' or 'mentor's'?
Suggestion: mentors'; mentor's
...be suggested that instead of salaries a mentors appraisal, perquisites or work-hours mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
...ke additional skill enhancing class for them selves, Conclusively, directly affecting a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
..., Conclusively, directly affecting a teachers salary on basis of his students perform...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51404494382 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0485423303 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2205502184 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.470588235 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197277052348 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647103683942 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491251557296 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122489182477 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028994415291 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.