Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling r

Essay topics:

Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The statement assumes that students’ academic performance is truly an outcome of teachers’ efforts and that students themselves have no role to play in their results. This, is not true. Such policy forces teachers rather than encourage them in their duty to enlighten students with knowledge.
Students academic performance is not based on teachers’ efforts alone. Students have different grasping powers, different interests and different levels of commitment. A batch of students can be good at mathematics for they can have a natural bent towards it, and not be so good in english. They may be able to learn mathematics at a faster pace and without much help than they learn english. To measure the performance of math and english teachers then, on this criteria lone, seems unfair to the teachers. Moreover, it can be possible that a class has a brilliant student who is excelling in almost all subjects and another that needs more time to work on the same topics. The same teachers taught the same things at the same time to these kids as they belong in one class. However, the difference in results of the students, show that their academic performance is no measure of teachers’ endeavour.
Superficially, it may seem, that this scheme of proportioning teachers’ salary on their students academic performance, may encourage teachers to put in more efforts. However, it can pressure them, and they in turn can pressure the students. To base their livelihood on students’ performance, seems to be a drastic measure to encourage teachers. There are other alternatives that schools can colleges can employ. Recognition of good teachers, monetary rewards for teachers whose students have outstanding results and providing teachers with the option of choosing their class hours are great ways that can inspire a teacher. If the salary of school faculty depends only on the marks that student obtain on their academic exams, we are in some way discouraging teachers from disseminating any knowledge that is not academic. School teachers inspire their students to be a better human being. They inculcate values in them. To dissuade them from discussing life in general, will not serve the purpose of schools which is to produce responsible and sensitive young adults. Thus, the scheme has a false appeal of increasing the efficiency of education system.
Hence, teachers efforts are not completely reflected in students performances, as students’ results are a dependent on many factors that are out of the influence of teachers. Such policies, if implemented could burden the teachers as well as the students. If encouraging teachers is the main purpose of this measure, then this can be achieved with alternative means which are not so drastic.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e of math and english teachers then, on this criteria lone, seems unfair to the teac...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'in general', 'as well as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249512670565 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.144249512671 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.093567251462 0.0880659088768 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0487329434698 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046783625731 0.0444667217837 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120857699805 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0272904483431 0.0406280797675 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9965124144 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0272904483431 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.083820662768 0.0997080785238 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0272904483431 0.0249443105267 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0175438596491 0.0148568991511 118% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2780.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 446.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2331838565 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390134529148 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.329596412556 0.280924506359 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251121076233 0.200843997647 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14798206278 0.132149295362 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9965124144 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484304932735 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.3197155569 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5833333333 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5943965249 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 141.124799967 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.458333333333 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 51.5429745889 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.65853658537 1.64882698954 101% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387972400097 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0983809701066 0.123202303941 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0729691466289 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.437936951574 0.547984918172 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15043670292 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146884273555 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752529085634 0.0892212321368 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.471939188107 0.385218514788 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0764594417652 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29198227667 0.275328986314 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515030065566 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.