To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
The author of the statement concludes that studding major city is the most striking and pivotal attribute of a community. While others believe that investigation huge city is not adequate information for collecting characterize of the city. I definitely disagree with this claim. Consider the both views in what follows, and my point would be delineated.
To begin with, every community has a particular attribute. As a matter of fact, as we know that what characterize is highly indispensable. Indeed, there is a variety attribute such as economical and social and historical. Knowing about this disparate attribute might lead to our purpose. One of the striking example for this issue is corresponds that Washington is a political city, New York is a economical and financial city. Provided that seeking political city, we should take heed to the Washington. Whereas as long as we want to assemble information which is relevant to business, taking heed to New York is greatly imperative without any doubt.
Besides, we all know that there is a plethora of diversity in the society. In fact, generalization is not worthwhile method. Due to the fact that, every community have a variety culture such as different accent, distinctive cloth and so forth. Generalization is not valid source for all of them. By considering this aspect, this indicates that as long as diversity was highly negligible in the community this approach is immensely worthwhile.
By taking into account, all of us know that grasping the most significant attribute depends to aspect of character which is so crucial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ington is a political city, New York is a economical and financial city. Provided...
^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ness, taking heed to New York is greatly imperative without any doubt. Besides...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to the fact that, every community have a variety culture such as different acce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, whereas, while, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21705426357 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05022753045 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7656733615 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1764705882 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.04669842033 0.243740707755 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.014144631665 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283099990152 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314995846169 0.150359130593 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146166757442 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.