The chart below shows the number of students applying to study different subjects at canada universities in between 2004 and 2008 and the predicted figures for 2012.
The below graph illustrates how many students applying study at canada universities in different subjects in between 2004 and 2008 and the predicted figures for 2012.
Firstly, In mechanical Engineering branch 5000 students had applied in 2004 but in 2008 students had decreased to 2000. In future 2012, universities will expect 1900 students only. In Information Technology branch 6500 students had applied in 2004 but in 2008 students had declined to 3000. In future 2012, universities will hope 1500 students only. In Business branch students had slightly increased in mentioned years. In 2004 year 4000 students had applied, in 2008, 5000 students had applied and universities will assume highly 6500 students. In civil Engineering branch it had totally decreased. In 2004 year 2000 students had applied. In 2008, the amount had increased and reached to 2900 and the universities will imagine only 2900 students applied in the year 2012.
To sum up, So many students had interested in only Information Technology and Business branches. Less number of students had applied in Mechanical engineering and civil engineering.
Comments
The chart below shows the
The chart below shows the number of students applying to study different subjects at canada universities in between 2004 and 2008 and the predicted figures for 2012.
give the sample answer
Sentence: Firstly, In mechanical Engineering brach 5000 students had applied in 2004 but in 2008 students had decreased to 2000.
Error: brach Suggestion: ?
Sentence: In Information Technology brach 6500 students had applied in 2004 but in 2008 students had declined to 3000.
Error: brach Suggestion: ?
Sentence: To sum up, So many students had intrested in only Information Technology and Business branches.
Error: intrested Suggestion: interested
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 76 100
wrong: In 2004 year
correct: In 2004, or In the year 2004
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 941 1000
No. of Different Words: 76 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.228 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.787 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 59 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.191 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.536 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.652 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.149 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4