Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, the population growth results in increased demand of transportation for the people. We face many problems in our day today life due to growing traffic and pollution. Raising the cost of petrol, will not provide the permanent solution and its not the best way too.
There are various health problems, physical problems, mental problems associated with this cause, such as breathing problems, skin disease, road traffic accidents, tension etc. Even it causes damage to the ozone layer making the air pollute.
According to my opinion, awareness should be created among people. Various means of communication like, ( Television, Radio, Internet, Pubic meetings issuing pamphlets to Schools, Colleges, Houses ) stating the disadvantages in using petrol can be determined.
In the past people used cycles, walking, carts etc for there means of locomotion, which neither created problem to people and environment. According the quote" old is gold", we should follow their mode of transportation. I personally prefer cycling and walking is the best way traveling shorter distances. It results in good health promoting exercise to body, burning extra calories. Government should take steps initiating the benefits of cycling and walking.
Thus according to my conclusion,Increasing the rate of petrol is not the best solution. Research should be approved to find natural petrol which does not cause any damage or use long lasting battery vehicles.
Sentence: Raising the cost of petrol, will not provide the permanent solution and its not the best way too.
Description: A determiner, possessive is not usually followed by a negator
Suggestion: Refer to its and not
Sentence: In the past people used cycles, walking, carts etc for there means of locomotion, which neither created problem to people and environment.
Description: The word neither is not usually used as an adverb
Suggestion: Refer to neither
flaws:
No. of Words: 223 350
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 223 350
No. of Characters: 1184 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.864 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.309 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.658 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.938 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.154 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.611 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5