The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the uk between 1974 and 2002 by different modes of transport.
The line graph compares the means of transport which were used to carried the goods quantities in England over the given period. It is evident that maximum goods transported in UK by road starting from 1974 to until 2002.
According to graph,from 1974 to 2002, transportation of goods by pipeline slightly increase, from 5 to 22 millions tonnes. The figure of goods transported by rail were almost constant with slight fluctuations at 40 millions tonnes. Adding to it, the quantity of goods carried by water upsurged from 40 to 65 millions tonnes. What is more, the amounts of goods transported by road made a remarkable improvement from 70 to about 100 million tonnes with slight ups and downs over the period of 28 years.
As far as comparison is concerned, in 1974, goods carried by water and rail were at same position whereas in 2002, there was a massive difference between goods carried. Moreover, in 1974, the goods transported by road was 7 times more as compared to pipeline.
It is therefore, clear that, pipeline carried minimum goods as compared to other modes.
Sentence: The line graph compares the means of transport which were used to carried the goods quantities in England over the given period.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to to and carried
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to goods and quantities
transportation of goods by pipeline slightly increase,
transportation ... increases,
transportation ... increased,
Sentence: It is evident that maximum goods transported in UK by road starting from 1974 to until 2002.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a preposition
Suggestion: Refer to to and until
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
How did you get this?
'in 1974, the goods transported by road was 7 times more as compared to pipeline.'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 9
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 184 200
No. of Characters: 867 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.712 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.629 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.833 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.477 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.713 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.159 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4