The line graph shows the number of articles published per year by male and female UK university professors and the bar charts shows publications by subject areas over the same time frame from four UK universities.
The line graph presents information on the amount of articles published annually from 2006 - 2012 by male and female university professors in the U.K. while the bar chart illustrates publications by the humanities, sciences and arts department from Warwick, Sheffield, York and Birmingham university over the same period surveyed.
Overall, data on the line graph show that male university professors published the highest number of articles over the period. The bar chart shows that the humanities department had the highest number of publication's in all the universities over the period.
From the line graph, at the beginning of the period, the male professors published more articles than the female professors at 3000 and 1000 respectively. This increased to over 3000 publications for the male professors and a peak of 3000 articles for their female counterparts by the end of the period.
The bar chart shows that the humanities department in Warwick university had the highest amount of publications in the four universities over the period at 120, followed by the sciences department at 90 and the arts department at 85. This is in comparison to the humanities and arts department at the Birmingham university, which had the lowest numbers of publications at 30 and approximately 15 respectively. The sciences department in sheffield university had the lowest score of published articles at about 10 amongst all the universities surveyed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humanities'' or 'humanity's'?
Suggestion: humanities'; humanity's
...he period. The bar chart shows that the humanities department had the highest number of pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humanities'' or 'humanity's'?
Suggestion: humanities'; humanity's
...period. The bar chart shows that the humanities department in Warwick university had th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
...over the period at 120, followed by the sciences department at 90 and the arts departmen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...y the sciences department at 90 and the arts department at 85. This is in comparison...
^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
... and approximately 15 respectively. The sciences department in sheffield university had ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38596491228 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16019656923 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394736842105 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1631366265 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.5 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387292330553 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217472690991 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112497172833 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288623568057 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101202350952 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.