The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak

The pie chart illustrates the occasions that are responsible for degradation of firming land and the table further elaborates how much land in North America, Europe and Oceania was degraded due to these occasions during the period of 1990s.

Overall, it can be seen that Over-cultivation did not affect any harm to the farming land in Oceania.

The proportion of firming land degradation due to over-grazing was the highest whereas the proportion of firming land degradation due to other occasions was the lowest and the figures are 35% and 7% accordingly. In the 1990s, the proportion of firming land degradation due to deforestation was higher than that of over-cultivation and the proportions are 30% and 28% respectively. Among the three reasons, the percentage of degraded firming land due deforestation was the highest in Europe whereas the proportion of firming land degradation due to the same reason was the lowest in North America with 9.8% and 0.2% successively. In North America the proportion of firming land degradation due to over-cultivation was higher than that of over-grazing and the percentages are 3.3% and 1.5% correspondingly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ages are 3.3% and 1.5% correspondingly.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37164226643 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6979767082 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.5 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920393338157 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609092462191 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454930713639 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859044017245 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511976326023 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ages are 3.3% and 1.5% correspondingly.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32786885246 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37164226643 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6979767082 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.5 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920393338157 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609092462191 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454930713639 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859044017245 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511976326023 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.