The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the proportion of various methods of processing perilous discharged products in three countries.
Overall, the same three ways of recycling, burying and burning are used in Korea and Sweden, whereas British people utilize 4 different measures to deal with their waste.
While the majority of trash in the Asian country, 69%, is recycled, only a quarter of rubbish in Sweden is treated in the same way. A similar disparity can also be spotted in the contribution of buried products, as this means of processing trash accounts for 55% in Sweden, being 2.5 times as high as in Korea.
Regarding the other European country, burying trash underground is responsible for the most significant figure of all methods (82%). Interestingly, British citizens employ two different ways of treating rubbish, chemical treatment and dumping at sea, both having a share of 8%. Finally, it is worth noticing that in all three nations, incineration is the least favorite means in terms of dealing with hazardous waste products.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22155688623 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78496550149 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670658682635 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0621483376 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080419454827 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402239254689 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526563949 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0604274317103 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517278057487 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.