The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities
the table compares the underground railway systems in 6 cities around the world in terms of opening dates, the length of routes and the number of annual commuters.
overall, the length of routes and the passenger numbers of 3 systems, with the latest opening years, namely Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles, are significantly lower than others.
As can be seen from the table, although London finished its railway systems in the oldest year among any surveyed cities (1863), the route is by far longer than those of others (394km). Over the 1900s, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, and Kyoto opened their underground railroad systems, which covered 199km, 155 km, 126km, and a mere 11 km, respectively. Finally, in 2001, the routes of Los Angeles systems are only 28 km long in total.
turning to the other information, 1927M commuting railway passengers in Tokyo per year. The following figure is seen in Paris with 1191M annual commuters. The numbers of subway users in other cities are significantly lower. London systems carry 775M passengers yearly, compared to the figures of 144M in America's capital, 50M in Los Angeles and only 45M in Kyoto.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the table compares the underground railway ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...es and the number of annual commuters. overall, the length of routes and the passenger...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Turning
... systems are only 28 km long in total. turning to the other information, 1927M commuti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01047120419 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53965021128 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9549297955 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157192477353 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066733398181 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719801942696 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109563650228 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908921397322 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.