Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r

Essay topics:

Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The map demonstrate plan for two possible sites for shopping mall in the city of Brandfield. It is evident from the map that two sites which are under consideration are in the north and south east of the town.

The first potential site for shopping mall, S1, is just to the north of the city center, above the railway line, which runs from North West to South East of the town. If it built here it is next to the housing estate, thus provide easy access to all the residents of both the location estate and the city center. It will also be next to the river, which runs through the town.

The site in the south east,S2, is again close to the railway line and fairly close to the city center, but this will close to the industrial estate rather than residential estate. There is a main road that run through the city and is close to both the sites, thus providing road good access to either location. A large golf course and park is in the west of the town that prevents this area from being available as a site.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this will close to the industrial estate rather than residential estate. There is...
^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is area from being available as a site.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.3125 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11021716727 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9511387163 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170260288784 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835905795114 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821585142013 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133277263148 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546042812514 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.