The bar graph illustrates information about three distinct exports commodity in the year 2000, 2019 and future prediction year 2025 of Southland.
Overall, by considering step-up export trends of international tourism, expected that it will increase gradually and exports of meat product will experience downward trends whereas, exports of dairy products fluctuated throughout the period.
Southland earned 8.1 billion sterling in 2000 from international tourism which is further increased and reached to 8.9 billion sterling in 2019. It is supposed to sprang in 2025 and will touch the peak point of 9.9 billion. In 2019, the collection from dairy products drastically increased in comparison to 2000s export rate and able to maintain equivalent with its 2025s international tourism. It is assumed that it will experience gradual reduction on exports in 2025.
Exports of meat product is minimal among other two sectors which ranges between 5-6 billion sterling only. Additionally, meat products plunged from 6 billion to approximately 5.6 in 2019. As a consequence of contineous decrement, 2025 will witness scanty exports throughtout 25 years period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'exports'' or 'export's'?
Suggestion: exports'; export's
...trates information about three distinct exports commodity in the year 2000, 2019 and fu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61142857143 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95365011123 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4121568945 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137042692018 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669360110289 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706409983696 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109328788578 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828726124426 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.