The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates us the amount of money which was donated by the proportion of British citizens of different age groups for charity purposes between the year 1990 and 2010.
In 1990, people of age group comprising of 18-25 years old, donated around 16% of their money in charity which was declined to 6% in 2010. Furthermore, young individuals of age group 26 to 35 had given about 31% of their money in charity in the year 1990, while this trend was decreased in 2010 with approximately 24% people participated in this activity. Then, in the year 1990, almost 41% citizens took part in this event by making the highest contribution of age group (36-50) years, but it had also fallen to 34% in the following year 2010.
In contrast, people ranging between 50 to 65 years, this trend was accelerated from 35% to near about 40% in the year 1990 and 2010 respectively and people above age 65 accounted for nearly 33% to 35 % in the given years of 1990 and 2010 respectively.
Overall, citizens of age group between 36 to 50 made up the largest contribution in charity, whereas people between 18 and 25 had the smallest contribution in all the years of 1990 and 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...d 2010. In 1990, people of age group comprising of 18-25 years old, donated around 16% of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64114832536 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6256021877 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492822966507 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.4415769416 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.666666667 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8333333333 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250308791672 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151766502184 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399747180829 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170881248014 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459425323538 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.