The chart below show the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevants.
The given bar chart gives information about the export value of one country while the table illustrates the change in proportion of one country in five kinds of products in two years 2015 and 2016.
It can be immediately seen that while the main trend of earning from exporting in most categories were increasing, gems and jewellery is the only type that decrease. Overall, the petroleum products earned the most in exporting, opposing the textiles with the lowest export earning.
Regarding the bar chart, petroleum products and engineered goods contributed the highest values in export earning, reached approximately $41 billions. On the other hand, in spite of growing nearly $5 billions, textiles had just equal export income to agricultural products at $31 billions.
Looking at the table, gems and jewellery was the only category went down in 2016 compared with 2015 at the level of 5.18%. Oppositely, textiles experienced the highest percentage of upward change with 15% when agricultural products had the smallest rise by 0.81%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e other hand, in spite of growing nearly billions, textiles had just equal export...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, regarding, well, while, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26060606061 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77947349527 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8646397972 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297395413578 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125108188868 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878492953578 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175170996435 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885287774339 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.