The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.You should write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

You should write at least 150 words.

The chart illustrates how much money was wasted on hamburger, fish and chips, and pizza in a week in the United Kingdom. The graph demonstrates how many fast food was consumed in gram in the years between 1970 and 1990.

Overall, people prefer spent money on hamburger, rather than on pizza. Moreover, consumption of fish and chips and hamburger in gram are increasing, but consuming pizza is decreasing.

According to the chart, people with a high income level spent about 45 pounds per week for hamburger, meanwhile, they spent about 17 pounds and 19 pounds on fish and chips and pizza respectively. Human with an average wage wasted about 33 GBP on hamburger, 25 pounds on fish and chips and approximately 12 pounds on pizza. In comparison with people, who have highly competitive wage, human with low salary purchased spent three times less on hamburger and pizza. The purchases on fish and chips is the same as high incomer's.

In the beginning of the period consumption of hamburger and fish and chips as about 80 gram and 20 gram respectively, while it was consumed 300 gram pizza. Fish and chips eating is dramatically increase and reached 500 gram in the end of period. Eating hamburger was also risen and reached its peak on 300 gram. However, consumption of pizza fell in the following 20 years and indicated 200 gram.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much fast food', 'a good deal of fast food'.
Suggestion: much fast food; a good deal of fast food
...ted Kingdom. The graph demonstrates how many fast food was consumed in gram in the years betwe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...nd approximately 12 pounds on pizza. In comparison with people, who have highly competitiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...amburger and fish and chips as about 80 gram and 20 gram respectively, while it was ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... fish and chips as about 80 gram and 20 gram respectively, while it was consumed 300...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pizza' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pizzas'.
Suggestion: pizzas
...ctively, while it was consumed 300 gram pizza. Fish and chips eating is dramatically ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...s dramatically increase and reached 500 gram in the end of period. Eating hamburger ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... also risen and reached its peak on 300 gram. However, consumption of pizza fell in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...he following 20 years and indicated 200 gram.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84279475983 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66297504496 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506550218341 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4436817522 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4166666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0777897378247 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335550954692 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345122648927 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590190269507 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350442957934 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.