The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012.
The given chart provides information on changes in crime incidence in downtown of New Port during a decade between 2003 and 2012.
There was a fluctuation in the number of incidence in the types of crimes committed in the city throughout the period. Initially, in 2003, the most widespread type of crime was burglary with nearly 3500 incidents, while car theft was at 2800 and robbery was at 600. In 2004, there was an increase in all three types of crimes; this figure rocketed to 3700 incidents for burglary, and the number of incidence in car theft and robbery rose slightly to 2850 and 700, respectively. Nevertheless, the number of incidents in burglary started decreasing after reaching its peak in 2004, and slumped to 1100 by 2008, then it leveled off at the level of 1500. In the meantime, car hijacking became the most common type of crime committed in the downtown in 2007, and it lasted till the end of the period. In contrast, robbery showed a minor fluctuation reaching a peak of 900 incidents in 2005, then gradually decreasing to 500 in 2008, and again increasing to 600 in 2013.
The infographic indicates that New Port police dealt with burglary well decreasing this figure substantially during the period of time; however, car theft failed to show any improvements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng this figure substantially during the period of time; however, car theft failed to show any ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85909090909 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73925775674 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531818181818 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.9652269972 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143367608585 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729575731885 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840026345118 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143229033261 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994572234678 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.