The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the GDP of Tunisia showed a noticeable decrease while the proportion of GDP in Japan showed the reverse. However, the growth in Ecuador's GDP was a marked decline with some fluctuation
In 2007, Tunisia revealed a significant growth in GDP, with over 6%, while for Ecuador, the GDP figure only reached almost a half as much. A very small proportion was seen in Japan. The proportion of Tunisia had fallen to the 2007 Ecuador’s GDP figure by 2010. While Ecuador’s GDP was close behind, the GDP of Japan showed a threefold increase.
Apart from the previous comparisons, overall changes were not always steady. While the proportion of Tunisia’s GDP declined noticeably in 2008, this showed a sign of stagnating to 3% in the following months. After a peak, Ecuador’s GDP plummeted to 1.1%. This was in stark contrast to the figure for Japan taking place as by far the most significant growth in GDP.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (GDP) must be used with a third-person verb: 'figures'.
Suggestion: figures
...d fallen to the 2007 Ecuador's GDP figure by 2010. While Ecuador's GDP was c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98830409357 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86218928309 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7393967285 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407224541142 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190607013584 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.276838895075 0.0843802449381 328% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381789899352 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.357945769862 0.0819641961636 437% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.