The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The vertical bar graph elucidates the precise information concerning how often the public prefer to buy coffee and tea in five Australian cities, which is measured in percentage with respect to the residents.
Overall, the bar graph highlights the striking patterns among the metropolitan areas in three categories. It is observed an increasing trend for instant coffee in the last 4 weeks, whereas a downward trend was noticed for fresh coffee, and those who visited café for drinks ebbed and flowed among the cities.
The bar reveals that demand for instant coffee started with 45% in Sydney, followed by Melbourne with 47%, and it rose to nearly 53% in Brisbane, then it dropped by 3% for Adelaide. However, these figures jumped to almost 55% in Hobart. Similarly, a decline in public interest for purchasing fresh coffee was seen in Sydney with 43% and it saw a gradual fall for Melbourne and Brisbane with 42% and 33% respectively. Then, these rates shown a slight increase in Adelaide (34%) and Hobart (38%)
In contrast, residents who preferred to visit a cafeteria to order coffee or tea witnessed high proportions in Melbourne, Hobart and Sydney of about 63%, 62%, and 61% individually. On the other hand, Brisbane portrayed more than one-half and Adelaide with approximately one-half of total percentage of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntage with respect to the residents. Overall, the bar graph highlights the st...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s ebbed and flowed among the cities. The bar reveals that demand for instant ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease in Adelaide 34% and Hobart 38% In contrast, residents who preferred to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, then, whereas, in contrast, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17431192661 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76370722091 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628440366972 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2755048939 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836974031612 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345969042124 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455405185735 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615030543687 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491252100973 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.