The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided Into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar illustrates how many minutes(in billion) of telephone calls considered of three types in United Kingdom, from 1995-2002.
Overall, the local fixed lines calls were popular over the 8 years. With International calls and mobiles calls second and third respectively. The numbers of 70 minutes spent by local calls in 1995. After that local calls increased continuously till the 1999. After that it decreased gradually and reached at again 70 billions minutes. Secondly, the numbers of minutes spent on international and national calls increased significantly and reached at 60 minutes in 2002. With mobile calls minutes increased dramatically and touched nearby 45 minutes.
The international and national calls increased steadily year on year with just under 40 billions in 1995 to peak of over 60 billions minutes in 2002. In 1995 to 1996, the number of minute spent under 10 by mobile calls user. While the figure doubled form approximately 22 minutes in 2000 to 40 billion in 2001.
In conclusion, in eight years of period form 1995 to 2002, the local calls remained highest among three calls in UK. Second thing, the mobile calls users increased after 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0 minutes spent by local calls in 1995. After that local calls increased continuously...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...te spent under 10 by mobile calls user. While the figure doubled form approximately 2...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 2002, the local calls remained highest among three calls in UK. Second thing, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1832460733 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71145559573 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8893807991 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1538461538 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240634866808 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101170496395 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059805879477 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170491102995 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193727090144 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.