The bar chart below illustrates the time spent on different kinds of calls throughout the United Kingdom between 1995 and 2002.
According to the chart, it is transparent that the local fixed calls were more prevalent during these seven years. Although it
shows an upward trend from 1995 by 71 billion minutes and reached to its peak by 90 billion in 1999, it encountered a downward trend after then and turned back to its first amount by 2002.
National and international fixed line had a growth throughout these seven years and from approximately 36 billion minutes gradually climbed to 61 billion minutes in 2002.
But the story about mobiles calls was thoroughly different. The whole mobiles calls in 1995 were just almost 2 billion minutes, though it demonstrated a dramatic rise up to 2002 by 45 million minutes.
In conclusion, it is manifestly transparent that utilizing cellphone had a significant increase, while by declining in local fixed line calls over last 4 years it is still the most well-known one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt during these seven years. Although it shows an upward trend from 1995 by 71 bi...
^^^
Line 8, column 79, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'call'.
Suggestion: call
...thoroughly different. The whole mobiles calls in 1995 were just almost 2 billion minu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, then, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07647058824 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75543501925 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5587186863 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208555190002 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896517216706 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471451052805 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983779249721 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463353561218 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.