The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided Into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The information is given in this chart is about the length of telephone calls in England in terms of local – fixed line, national and international – fixed line and mobiles from 1995 to 2002.
From the overview perspective, the number of minutes of local fixed-line was the highest number and the figure for minutes of mobiles was the lowest one in the period of 7 years.
Firstly, local fixed-line is the type which was used predominantly. Specifically, over 70 billion minutes was the figure for this type in 1995 which was as double as the total number of minutes of national and international – fixed line and was as over seventh as the figure for another call type. The number of minutes of local – fixed reached the peak at exactly 90 billion in 1999 and then decreased significantly to roughly 70 billion in the end of this period.
Secondly, the figure for the other categories rose from 1995 to 2002. More specific, the total number of minutes of national and international – fixed line increased slightly and reached the highest number at over 60 billion at 2002. The figure for last call type climbed sharply in the whole period. It was only about 5 billion in 1995 and in the last year, it reached the peak at around 45 billion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reached the peak at around 45 billion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65765765766 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56467357055 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400900900901 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3426958905 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188370291494 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927863053669 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462318348645 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137381066001 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270131814847 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.