The bar chart and table demonstrate how much the amount of earnings from exported products of one country have changed from 2015 to 2016.
One of the most profitable fields is the petroleum products with $62 billion earnings which includes a 3% increase by 3%. Moreover, the profit from engineered goods rose wildly from 57 billion to $65 billion and stayed at the second place.
Meanwhile, there is a decrease in the earning of the gems and jewelry sphere of about 5,18% while the agricultural products did not have crucial changes such as other categories did and increased only by 0,81%. The earnings of textile industry, however, experienced a gradual rise of just over 15% and ended the year at about $32 billion.
Overall, from the table it is obvious that only the profit from the gems and jewelry decreased. In addition the earnings from the textile rose and reached the same level as agricultural products, while the profit of engineered goods experienced the same change and started to earn nearly as much as the first category. It means that the textile and engineered goods started to be more demanded than it was a year ago while other goods did not experienced such wild changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...from the gems and jewelry decreased. In addition the earnings from the textile rose and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'experience'
Suggestion: experience
...as a year ago while other goods did not experienced such wild changes.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81951219512 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55583688859 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9227139752 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994864623298 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498935731671 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802597440483 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852768560578 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985294397326 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.