The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of anthropology students on different destinations of work after accomplishing their course at one university while the table compares the levels of wage they reveive after having done three given types of jobs for five years.
Overall, while the number of graduates doing full-time work is the most, anthropologists receiving the highest level of salary are the ones working in government sector.
As can be seen from the chart, full-time work is the most commonly done among other types of work, which accounts for over a half of the graduates. Meanwhile, the proportion of graduates who are employed to work part-time stands at only 15 percent, which is slightly bigger than that of those who are jobless. Besides, the figure for combining part-time work and post-graduate study is the least chosen.
After five years working in various positions, the level of salaries of anthropologists has varied. To be specific, the number of employees in government receiving the wage of over 100000 is the most, accounting for fifty percent, which is significantly larger than that of the ones working as freelance consultants and in private companies, which stand at forty percent and thirty percent respectively. The ones receiving from 25000 to 49999 dollars for salary account for only five percent for government and consulting work and ten percent for working at private companies. The other two type of salaries of three given jobs fluctuates between fifteen and forty percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27049180328 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8650794862 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52868852459 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0001763666 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234146726408 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115453686201 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902438540102 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162292686349 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628074909341 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.