The charts below give information about the percentage of sources of the electricity produced between 2003 nd 2008 0f 4 counties
Four pie charts compare the amount of electricity which manufactured from some different power resources of four nations from 2003 to 2008. Overall, India and Sweden produced power from three kinds of materials while the other countries only used two sources to create electricity.
There are three types of sources of the electricity produced between 2003 and 2008 in India and Sweden. Fossil fuel was used the most popular in India in India with 80%, which accounted for 4%- the smallest percentage in Sweden. Only 3,5% of electricity was made from nuclear power in India while this was the principal material to produce power with 65% in Sweden. The percentage of hydropower of the electricity produced was 16,5% and 31% in India and Sweden respectively.
Marocco and Viet Nam manufactured electricity from fossil fuel and hydropower. The proportion of fossil fuel in Marocco was 9,5% while the amount of hydropower was only 4,5%. The percentage of two kinds of this sources in Viet Nam was quite equal with 47% of fossil fuel and 53% of the other source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in India'.
Suggestion: in India
.... Fossil fuel was used the most popular in India in India with 80%, which accounted for 4%- the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly 4,5%. The percentage of two kinds of this sources in Viet Nam was quite equal wit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98314606742 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61619870126 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443820224719 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5432395536 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174491402346 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962711718059 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923065672603 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121161869746 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505755196152 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.