The pie charts below illustrate the population ages for Yemen and Italy in 2000 and the prediction regarding these countries for 2015.
According to the two first charts, it is manifest that the majority of Yemen population is included by individuals between ages 0 and 59, while 50.1 percent of them account for people from 0 to 14 years old and 43.3 percent are individuals are 15-59 years old in 2002. However, in the year 2050 the proportion of 15-59 years had a growth and climbed to 57.3 percent and 0-14 years dropped to 37.0 percent. In addition, the percentages of elderly people were insignificant in both years.
On the other hand, when it comes to two last charts associated with Italy population ages, the illustration revealed that people from age group of 15-59 years encompass more than half of the Italy population in 2000 by 61.6 percent, although individuals between 0-14 years old and above age of 60 stand on 14.1 and 24.1 percent respectively. The number of old people of Italy will undergo a dramatic rise and will reach 42.3 by 2050 according to the survey, though 15-59 years old one will have a slight decrease.
To sum up, in both nations the average age will face a rise, although this phenomenon is more distinctive in Italy with respect to the anticipation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'stand' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'stands'.
Suggestion: stands
...ween 0-14 years old and above age of 60 stand on 14.1 and 24.1 percent respectively. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79910714286 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63684387694 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4743025348 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.571428571 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2857142857 5.23603664747 273% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149009293698 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082350000304 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883050898768 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123215451545 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936959571137 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.