The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
e given charts illustrate a survey in the US of each typical meal with the average proportion of three nutrients consisting of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar. If the amount of each factor's income is not controlled, all of which can be harmful to the body.
Overall, It is indispensable with the appearance of three types of nutrients for each typical course. However, each ingredient witnesses a difference in percent on the scale of each main meal.
In regard to the first chart, the average percentage of sodium in Breakfast is less than a fifth while saturated fat accounts for 16%, this figure is also observed in the proportion of added sugar. It is indicated that the three ingredients of nutrients experience a decrease in the average proportion in lunch meals with the figure being 29% for sodium, saturated fat making up for 26%, and compared to 19% for added sugar
It is clear that there are a large amount of three factors of nutrients in dinner courses, all of which account for above more than a fifth while sodium makes up almost a half - 43%, and gradually declines with 37% was observed in the average percentage of saturated fat and there is the great disparity with 23% of added sugar in dinner. In the terms of snacks, consuming the largest amount of sugar (42%), twice that of saturated fat whereas sodium is only accounted for 14%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: E
e given charts illustrate a survey in the...
^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...gar It is clear that there are a large amount of three factors of nutrients in dinner...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73949579832 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58754052673 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 156.232427583 43.030603864 363% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.142857143 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173287625358 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913605031324 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502302866753 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124217563659 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344148379273 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.