The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided charts depict the owned electrical appliances in a household as well as the hours of house chores done by using them from 1929 to 2019.
Overall, the refrigerator was nearly unused in 1920 which became the most poplar appliances in 2019 along with the vacuum cleaner. Moreover, the number of hours of housework in a week decreased since 1920 as well.
In 1920, 40% of the houseworks were done by washing machine which was followed by a steady increase of the machine's usage till 1960, reaching just 70%. Although the appliance was nearly 60% in use in 1980, its utilization rose up to more than 70% in 2019. Similarly, only 30% of the houses were able to buy and run the vacuum cleaner 1920 but its usages expanded dramatically over the years and became quite famous as all houses in 2000 owned one. Finally, the refrigerator was not available in 1920 and less than 10% of houses used to own one. Just like the vacuum cleaner, this instrument showed full availability in 100% of the houses by 1980.
People used to spent 50 hours per week doing household works in 1920. While the weekly hours reduced sharply till 1960 (20 hours weekly), after 1960, the hours consumed by household chores in a week had decreased gradually and by 2019, almost 10 hours a week was needed to complete those tasks.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...as followed by a steady increase of the machines usage till 1960, reaching just 70%. Alt...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, moreover, similarly, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66810344828 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40227779716 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5790725541 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147278163444 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068492364968 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378302904508 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100235148783 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242952434603 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...as followed by a steady increase of the machines usage till 1960, reaching just 70%. Alt...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, moreover, similarly, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66810344828 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40227779716 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581896551724 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5790725541 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147278163444 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068492364968 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378302904508 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100235148783 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242952434603 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.