The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarise the informationi by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts indicate the main causes in the domain of two studies purposes (career, interest) which compares the various aged students and the certain amount of maintenance, gaining from employers.
It is clearly seen that the first graph presents a slight reduction in a study for career reasons with different ages. Approximately, 80 % of students under 26 years old study for their personal career. However, this percentage drops gradually about 10% per decade. Likewise, as we can see, just about 40% of students aged 40-49 as well as fewer than 20% of students over 49 aged studying for their career.
By contrast, the first graph also shows that there is a slight increase among the students studying for interest purposes. At first, there are 10% of students under 26 years old studying for interest . The rate of learners goes up till 40% percent and then followed by a noticeable increase by 70% of over 49 years old learners. However, students in career and learners in interest purposes vary significantly.
The second graph provides that employer supports approximately 60% of under 26 aged students. By the third decade, it drops to about 33% of 30-39 aged groups, but it is not clear that it follow by a slight grow up to 43% approximately of over 49 aged students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...under 26 years old studying for interest . The rate of learners goes up till 40% ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, second, so, then, third, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91705069124 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66954245385 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557603686636 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.715320392 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208584903021 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826277504785 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632168223986 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134468877301 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587338608147 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.