The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts compares the numbers of different destinations apart from full-time employment chosen by graduates and postgraduates in the UK in the year of 2008.

Overall, although the number of graduates in four kinds of careers was higher than the postgraduates' one ,the proportions between two groups were alike. And it is clear that further study was the most popular choice both for graduates and postgraduates.

According to the first bar chart, 29,665 numbers of students chose to study further , whose figure was strictly dominating other destinations. Part-time work was the second most attracting selection ,with 17,735 students and the figure for it was slightly higher than the number of those who struggled with unemployment. And less people wanted to do voluntary work.

Let's look at the next graph, there were more postgraduates who preferred to continuing studying or doing a part-time job rather than other destinations, with 2,725 students and 2,535 students respectively, whilst 1,625 postgraduates found no job , almost 1,000 students less than the number of those with part-time work. Resembling graduates , postgraduates were less likely to be an volunteer, with only 345 people.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The bar charts compares the numbers of different destinations a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rs was higher than the postgraduates one ,the proportions between two groups were ...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mbers of students chose to study further , whose figure was strictly dominating ot...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was the second most attracting selection ,with 17,735 students and the figure for ...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...se who struggled with unemployment. And less people wanted to do voluntary work. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... people wanted to do voluntary work. Lets look at the next graph, there were more...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... whilst 1,625 postgraduates found no job , almost 1,000 students less than the num...
^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ith part-time work. Resembling graduates , postgraduates were less likely to be an...
^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... , postgraduates were less likely to be an volunteer, with only 345 people.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46524064171 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00618015321 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620320855615 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3167740408 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166638368145 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743436451342 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489456545028 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111958562268 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472471071036 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.