The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The four pie charts given detail the alteration in tourism in Australia and Germany between 1960 and 2010.
At first glance, it can be immediately seen that over this time period the Asian tourism boomed. In fact, what strikes the most is the drastic redistribution of percentages in Australia: European tourists significantly dropped and were replaced by Asians. In Germany the situation remained about the same, although the Asian slice incremented.
More in detail, in 1960 the two countries had similar tourist affluence. In Australia more than half were Europeans, a quarter British, 12 per cent from the USA and a tenth Asians. Meanwhile, in Germany, the only big difference was that a quarter of travelers came from the USA and British were just one fifth.
In 2010 instead, the tourist configuration changed completely between the two. Australia is dominated by Asian tourism, with 63 per cent, whereas in Germany it is only one fourth. Both British traveling to Australia and Germany decreased, by 5 per cent and 14 per cent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean '(Asians)'?
Suggestion: (Asians)
...h, 12 per cent from the USA and a tenth Asians. Meanwhile, in Germany, the only big di...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14534883721 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.857077546 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7160283353 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803779617707 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362396038647 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395665664735 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512867368546 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131249068313 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.