Comparison of car theft
The presented line chart provides the number of car which were thieved during nine years in 4 countries, namely Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada.
In general, the total of car theft in Great Britain was the most, whereas that of in Canada was the lowest.
Firstly, in 1990, the car theft in Great Britain were approximately 20000 vehicles, followed by one in Canada, at 7000 cars. From 1990 to 1993, after having witnessed a slight increase in the number of car thieved in 1991, the cars theft decreased moderately at 17000 vehicles. The total of car theft in Canada also dropped to 5000 cars. After that, both of Great Britain and Canada experienced a small rise in the number of car theft, at 20000 and 6000 vehicles in 1997. In the last two years, while the total of car thieved in Great Britain reduced at 17000 cars, one in Canada reached at peak 7000 cars in 1999.
On the other hand, in 1990, the number of car theft in Sweden and France was 8000 and 6000 vehicles. Over the period between 1990 to 1993, both of which fluctuated and stayed at 8500 cars and 7000 cars respectively. In 1997, the total of car theft in Sweden jumped to 12000 vehicles, twice as high as in France in 1996,then staying constant at this number in 1998. By contrast, this figure in France at the same time was 6000 cars. In the last year -1999- the number of car thieved in Sweden leaped to a new peak (14000 cars) while one in France just had 6000 vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, so, then, whereas, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46240601504 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19986496073 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43984962406 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3162726747 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9166666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313855005039 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165091811485 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700360318758 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203599227301 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827045974187 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.