The diagram below shows how Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
A pictogram beneath illustrates the methods of up-to-minute weather information collection done by Australian Bureau of Meteorology on the weather for reliable forecast production.
The diagram shows that the Bureau mentioned above undergo four processes in forecast release. First, an information must be collected in forms of satellites, which are located in the outer space, then there are radars that are set in land. Drifting buoys are also placed in seas as a mean of data collection.
Satellites produce photos that shows composite images of the hemisphere. These images therefore are analyzed and prepared for broadcasting via television or radio. A radar is on object- detection system that uses radio waves for detection of range, angle and velocity. It consists of a transmitter producing microwaves via a receiver and a processor. Data obtained from radars are seen on a screen that are studied scientifically and pepped for information dissemination via TV newsreaders and radio broadcasters like what they do with satellite images. Since drifting buoys are set apart and placed on seas, findings collected from them are often seen as synoptic charts that are based from water temperature, height and dominant wave period. These data are then transmitted via radio. After processing these information, it is then spread then via recorded announcement that differed from the other two methods.
In conclusion, For Australian Bureau of Meteorology does not rely on one method alone for more accurate information that is essential for the protection of human lives and property. Accuracy and urgency will equip citizens for possible disasters, these methods could not stand alone, therefore combination of these will lead to lessening of their cons and more of their pros. As the saying goes "Two heads are better then one", but in this case there are three.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 805, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...transmitted via radio. After processing these information, it is then spread then via recorded an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standalone'?
Suggestion: standalone
...ible disasters, these methods could not stand alone, therefore combination of these will le...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 416, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
... As the saying goes 'Two heads are better then one', but in this case there are t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... saying goes 'Two heads are better then one', but in this case there are t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 965.302439024 165% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37837837838 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91560121762 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 106.607317073 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4269276633 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203060716741 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649910764081 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892851643339 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157690933812 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11039430419 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 40.7170731707 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.