The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart shows the percentage of how good students manage their finances and the table depicts the number of students in three age groups organises finance well. Overall, it is clear that most of the students' answers are fairly organised. The number of students in the age group of over 36 years is very organised.

Looking at the first chart, the highest number of students, with 55%, respond that they organise their finances very well. The figure for those who answer very or not very organised is lower, at around 20%. By contrast, only a few students say that they are not at all organised, at 4%.

Turning to the second chart, we can see that most of those who are 36-year-old are very organised, while there are only 26% of students who are in their 23-25 years manage their finances well. On the other hand, the proportion of students aged up to 22 years, which is the lowest percentage, is very organised at managing their finances, at 18%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nd chart, we can see that most of those who are 36-year-old are very organised, while t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, second, well, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65294117647 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35221312266 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7476785098 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835610004144 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496835242091 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312822046907 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655194073033 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277209741369 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.