The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The flow chart depicts what typically occurs as a consequence of deforestation. There are four effects of cutting trees: flooding, degraded vegetation, the reduction of biodiversity.
One obvious consequence of deforestation is soil which has been compressed by heavy logging equipment. Once the soil becomes hard and “baked”, the exhaustion of rain water, eventually flooding, will present.
Another consequence is the reduction of number of roots holding the top soil together. As a result, this leads to the erosion of top soil. Because top soil wears away, pioneer species move in and vegetation is decayed.
The third effect is the increased threat of both intentional and unexpected burning. The remained wood after logging is destroyed and micro-orgainisms that feed on waste are lost; therefore, vegetation is degraded.
Finally, plants have been returning less moisture to the atmosphere, so there is less precipitation and an increased occurrence of drought. This also leads to various results of degraded vegetation and loss of biodiversity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, therefore, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60248447205 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21872199633 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645962732919 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6492971608 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784577867579 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031588617195 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059764362519 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432210815503 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473417001884 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.