Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You may spend more than an hour on a 20-minutes-driving distance each morning, only because of the heavy traffic. Since cars have become the most popular transport, it brings people so much convenience. However, the increasing numbers of cars put over-burdened pressure on road and the traffic problem is sometime a disaster to everybody. I think government should invest in railways to improve public transport to release the road pressure.
Railway transports include train, metro and light-rail train. Compared to car, train is so environment-friendly. Some modern trains use electricity as driving energy and produce H2 and H2O. If more trains replace cars, it will reduce carbon dioxide emission and alleviate the global warming problem. Another advantage of railway transport is that it makes people travel more efficient. A train could carry hundreds people in one trip without stopping by traffic light or congestion. If more people take trains as daily transport, cars on road will decrease and vehicle in emergency, such as ambulance, could drive on road without disturb. Furthermore, according to statistic, railway transport is the safest way to travel. The best way to avoid a car accident is not travelling by car.
The advantages of railway transport are apparent, why are there many people make driving cars as their first choice when they travel? It may caused by lack of railway investment and construction. Not all areas are easily accessible to train station or metro station, people in these areas have no other option than cars. Or the facility in railway transport can’t meet people’s expectation and demand, for example, no sanitary in stations.
To sum up, government should put more investment in railway, so that more people would travel by this optimal way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29616724739 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96990452578 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2026233389 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4444444444 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0735907304281 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027041914507 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301919317626 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596706206805 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235849264189 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 40.7170731707 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.