The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Given is a line graph shows the amount of water use in 3 sectors - agriculture, industry and homes around the world from 1900 to 2000. While the table below gives the information about the consumption of water in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000.
As we can see in the graph, agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water use ( around 500 Km) in 1900, but industrial and domestic water consumption only stood at a fifth of agriculture. However, water use of these three sectors kept increasing from 1900 to 2000, and respectively reached nearly 3000 km, exactly 1000 km and slightly below 500 km in 2000.
Taking a look at the table below which illustrates water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000. Because of there were 33 times more people in Brazil ( 176 million) than in Congo (5.2 million) as well as 265 times more irrigated, results in that per person in Brazil used 359 km water, while only 8 m in Congo.
To sum up, it's clear that global water needs increased significantly worldwide from 1900-2000. Especially agriculture from where vegetables derived.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the largest proportion of water use around 500 Km in 1900, but industrial a...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of water use around 500 Km in 1900, but industrial and domestic water consum...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here were 33 times more people in Brazil 176 million than in Congo 5.2 million a...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...times more people in Brazil 176 million than in Congo 5.2 million as well as 265...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs increased" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'increasing' or 'to be increased'.
Suggestion: increasing; to be increased
...m up, its clear that global water needs increased significantly worldwide from 1900-2000....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, well, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85561497326 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71099232799 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604278074866 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7616981591 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231162534476 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119349055348 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794059323874 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147094804363 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627175042555 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.