The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph demonstrates the six different fuel types consumed by Americans from 1980 to 2008, and the prediction until 2030.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that there will be an upward trend in the consumption of energy in the USA during the examined period. The fossil fuels (petrol and oil, coal, natural gas) are the main sources of energy.
In 1980, the Americans used up a total of approximately 82 quadrillion units of energy. This number rose up gradually over the years. It reached over 100 in 2008, which is 1,2 times higher than 18 years ago. It is predicted that the energy consumption in the USA will stand at 120q units by the year of 2030.
The fossil fuels have been and are projected to continue being the dominant types of consumed energy. 35q units of petrol and oil were used in 1980, followed by natural gas and coal at 20 and 15 respectively. The alternative fuels such as nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower trailed far behind with less than 5q units of each were consumed. In 2030, the consumption of petrol and oil will reach a new height of almost 50q units which will be approximately 3 times more than the combined amount of nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower energy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69668246445 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58745203259 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0258720104 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12692589117 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513433789492 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049487371892 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952548696717 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467622863626 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.