The graph below show current rates of secondary and higher education among people in various parts of the world. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two graphs comparing the rates of secondary and tertiary education among male and female in different parts of the world. While the lowest proportion for the two genders is in Sub-Saharan Africa in both graphs, Europe has been the region having the highest proportion for both genders.
In contrast with nearly 100% female and 90% male having secondary education in adolescence in Europe, the figures for male and female in East Asia are by far lower, at approximate 45% and 47%, respectively. Similarly, the differences are also significant when comparing the proportion of teenagers educated in secondary schools between Latin America region and SSA region, stating around 47% and 45% for female and male in Latin America, respectively, to only 19% and 9% for the two genders in SSA.
With regard to higher education of adult, the bar chart has revealed a remarkably lower proportion of population in those regions generally. It is worth noting that the percentages of adult having higher education are not significantly different in SSA, Latin America and East Asia, which are roughly 29%, 23% and 26% for male, respectively, and remaining the same at 19% for female in the first two listed regions then slightly being higher in East Asia, at around 25%. In contrast, the figures for adult in Europe are much more higher, reach nearly 41% for male and 49% for female.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...hest proportion for both genders. In contrast with nearly 100% female and 90% male ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...he figures for adult in Europe are much more higher, reach nearly 41% for male and 49% for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01298701299 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67000971089 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528138528139 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.754191435 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.428571429 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932790601903 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640082840205 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765743922324 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785792419466 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363016003222 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.